(For authors' information. For reviewers' use only)
Item Code *
Evaluation Date *
1. COVER section of the article
1.1. Títle
1.1.1. Title (initial capital only)
-
YES
-
NO
1.1.2. Is the title correctly worded?
-
YES
-
NO
1.1.3. Is the title in second language included?
-
YES
-
NO
1.1.4. Is the title in second language written correctly?
-
YES
-
NO
1.2. Abstracts and keywords
1.2.1. Main abstract (up to 80 words)
-
YES
-
NO
1.2.2. Are 3 or 4 keywords listed?
-
YES
-
NO
1.2.3. Is the abstract written in a second language?
-
YES
-
NO
1.2.4. Are 3 or 4 keywords listed in the second language?
-
YES
-
NO
1. COVER of the article • Comments
Use this space to collect your observations and comments on this section (title, authors, abstract and keywords)
2. FORMAT section of the article
2.1. Article body
2.1.1. Does the article follow the format suggested by the journal?
Maximum 20 pages, chapter styles, subchapters, texts, titles and fonts
-
YES
-
NO
-
With observations
2.2. Tables, tables, figures and graphs
2.2.1. Are the tables, figures, graphs and tables correctly identified, numbered, with their respective legend and source?
-
YES
-
NO
-
With observations
-
Does not apply
2.2.2. Are the tables, charts, graphs and figures relevant and they have the necessary quality to be published?
-
YES
-
NO
-
With observations
-
Does not apply
2. FORMAT of the article • Comments
Use this space to collect your observations and comments on the «Article FORMAT»
3. CONTENT section of the article
3.1. The article is the result of:
-
Research work
-
Revisión bibliográfica
3.2. Is the TITLE appropriate to the content of the study?
-
YES
-
NO
-
With observations
3.2. TITLE • Comments
Use this space to collect your observations and comments on the «TITLE»
3.3. The ABSTRACT. Does the summary adequately collect ...?
3.3.1. Target
-
YES
-
NO
-
With observations
3.3.2. Methodology
-
YES
-
NO
-
With observations
3.3.3. Results
-
YES
-
NO
-
With observations
3.3.4. Conclusions
-
YES
-
NO
-
With observations
3.3.5. Are the selected KEYWORDS appropriate?
-
YES
-
NO
-
With observations
3.3. ABSTRACT • Comments
Use this space to collect your observations and comments on the «SUMMARY»
3.4. The INTRODUCTION
3.4.1. Does the introduction adequately present the problem?
-
YES
-
NO
-
With observations
3.4.2. In the introduction is the objective of the investigation presented?
-
YES
-
NO
-
With observations
3.4.3. Is there justification for the research in the introduction?
-
YES
-
NO
-
With observations
3.4. INTRODUCTION • Comments
Use this space to collect your observations and comments on the «INTRODUCTION»
3.5. The METHODOLOGY
3.5.1. Is the methodology used adequate for the study problem and the stated objective?
-
YES
-
NO
-
With observations
3.5.2. Does the methodology present the description of the study sample, indicating the reason for its choice?
-
YES
-
NO
-
With observations
3.5.3. Does the methodology detail the variables considered?
-
YES
-
NO
-
With observations
3.5.4. Does the methodology present the statistical analysis used?
-
YES
-
NO
-
With observations
3.5.5. Does the methodology describe in detail and orderly the procedure followed and its justification?
-
YES
-
NO
-
With observations
3.5. METHODOLOGY • Comments
Use this space to collect your observations and comments on the «METHODOLOGY»
3.6.The RESULTS
3.6.1. Do the results cover the objectives set?
-
YES
-
NO
-
With observations
3.6.2. Do the results respond to what is stated in the methodology?
-
YES
-
No
-
With observations
3.6.3. Are the results presented and described adequately in tables, figures, graphs?
-
YES
-
NO
-
With observations
-
Does not apply
3.6.4. Are the results of the statistical analyzes reported?
-
YES
-
NO
-
With observations
-
Does not apply
3.6. The RESULTS• Comments
Use this space to collect your observations and comments on the "RESULTS"
3.7. The DISCUSSION
3.7.1. Does the discussion respond to the stated objectives?
-
YES
-
NO
-
With observations
3.7.2. Does the discussion adequately analyze the results obtained?
-
YES
-
NO
-
With observations
3.7.3. In the discussion, are the results obtained adequately contrasted with those of other authors?
-
YES
-
NO
-
With observations
3.7. The DISCUSSION • Comments
Use this space to collect your observations and comments on the «DISCUSSION»
3.8. The CONCLUSIONS
3.8.1. Do the conclusions adequately respond to the results obtained?
-
YES
-
NO
-
With observations
3.8.2. Do the conclusions cover the objectives proposed by the research?
-
YES
-
NO
-
With observations
3.8. The CONCLUSIONS • Comments
Use this space to collect your observations and comments on the "CONCLUSIONS"
3.9. BIBLIOGRAPHY / REFERENCES
3.9.1. Is the bibliography relevant to explain the problem and the results obtained?
-
YES
-
NO
-
With observations
3.9.2. Do all citations in the text have a corresponding reference in the bibliography?
-
YES
-
NO
-
With observations
3.9.3. Do the citations and bibliographic references follow APA standards?
-
SI
-
NO
-
With observations
3.9.4. Do all bibliographic references have their corresponding citation in the text?
-
YES
-
NO
-
With observations
3.9. BIBLIOGRAPHY • Comments
Use this space to collect your observations and comments on the «BIBLIOGRAPHY»
4. Final section DECISION
DECISION of the Evaluator
Select what apply
-
Approuved
-
Minor fixes
-
Major fixes
-
Rejected
VEREDICT
Verdict with summary of reasoning to report to author (s). * Mandatory