Percepciones éticas de estudiantes universitarios sobre el uso de la inteligencia artificial en sus producciones científicas

Glenda SALAS; Yessi E. VILLASANTE; Giovanna CHIRINOS; Rossana VILLANUEVA

doi:10.48082/espacios-a26v47n03i13

Authors

Glenda SALAS Universidad Nacional de San Agustín Author
Yessi E. VILLASANTE Universidad Nacional de San Agustín Author
Giovanna CHIRINOS Ministry of Defence Author
Rossana VILLANUEVA Cesar Vallejo University Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48082/espacios-a26v47n03i13

Keywords:

inteligencia artificial, ética académica, educación superior, integridad científica, estudiantes universitarios

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) has transformed university learning, generating ethical challenges related to authorship and originality. This quantitative, descriptive, and cross-sectional study analyzed the ethical perceptions of 249 university students regarding the use of AI in scientific productions. The results show a favorable perception of AI as an academic support tool, conditioned by adherence to ethical principles. Additionally, students demonstrate critical awareness of risks such as plagiarism, technological dependence, and the potential impact on critical thinking.

References

Akgun, S., & Greenhow, C. (2022). Artificial intelligence in education: Addressing ethical challenges in K-12 settings. AI and Ethics, 2(3), 431-440. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-021-00096-7

Benavides Torres, E. N., & Pazmiño Palma, E. F. (2026). Navegando la IA: Un análisis de las experiencias y percepciones éticas de estudiantes universitarios. METANOIA: REVISTA DE CIENCIA, TECNOLOGÍA E INNOVACIÓN, 12(1), 378-397. https://doi.org/10.61154/metanoia.v12i1.4212

Chen, L., Chen, P., & Lin, Z. (2020). Artificial Intelligence in Education: A Review. IEEE Access, 8, 75264-75278. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2988510

Cotton, D. R. E., Cotton, P. A., & Shipway, J. R. (2024). Chatting and cheating: Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 61(2), 228-239. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2023.2190148

Dwivedi, Y. K., Kshetri, N., Hughes, L., Slade, E. L., Jeyaraj, A., Kar, A. K., Baabdullah, A. M., Koohang, A., Raghavan, V., Ahuja, M., Albanna, H., Albashrawi, M. A., Al-Busaidi, A. S., Balakrishnan, J., Barlette, Y., Basu, S., Bose, I., Brooks, L., Buhalis, D., … Wright, R. (2023). Opinion Paper: “So what if ChatGPT wrote it?” Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management, 71, 102642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102642

Field, A. (2018). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (5th edition). SAGE.

Floridi, L., Cowls, J., Beltrametti, M., Chatila, R., Chazerand, P., Dignum, V., Luetge, C., Madelin, R., Pagallo, U., Rossi, F., Schafer, B., Valcke, P., & Vayena, E. (2018). AI4People—An Ethical Framework for a Good AI Society: Opportunities, Risks, Principles, and Recommendations. Minds and Machines, 28(4), 689-707. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-018-9482-5

George, D., & Mallery, P. (2019). IBM SPSS Statistics 26 Step by Step: A Simple Guide and Reference (6.a ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429056765

Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2019). Artificial intelligence in education: Promises and implications for teaching and learning. Center for Curriculum Redesign.

Kasneci, E., Sessler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., Gasser, U., Groh, G., Günnemann, S., Hüllermeier, E., Krusche, S., Kutyniok, G., Michaeli, T., Nerdel, C., Pfeffer, J., Poquet, O., Sailer, M., Schmidt, A., Seidel, T., … Kasneci, G. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, 102274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274

Lim, W. M., Gunasekara, A., Pallant, J. L., Pallant, J. I., & Pechenkina, E. (2023). Generative AI and the future of education: Ragnarök or reformation? A paradoxical perspective from management educators. The International Journal of Management Education, 21(2), 100790. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2023.100790

Llerena-Izquierdo, J., & Ayala-Carabajo, R. (2025). Ethics of the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Academia and Research: The Most Relevant Approaches, Challenges and Topics. Informatics, 12(4), 111. https://doi.org/10.3390/informatics12040111

Otzen, T., & Manterola, C. (2017). Técnicas de Muestreo sobre una Población a Estudio. International Journal of Morphology, 35(1), 227-232. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0717-95022017000100037

Perkins, M. (2023). Academic Integrity considerations of AI Large Language Models in the post-pandemic era: ChatGPT and beyond. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 20(2). https://doi.org/10.53761/1.20.02.07

Setia, M. (2016). Methodology series module 3: Cross-sectional studies. Indian Journal of Dermatology, 61(3), 261. https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5154.182410

UNESCO. (2022). Recommendation on the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence [Pdf]. UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000381137_spa

World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects. (2013). JAMA, 310(20), 2191. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2013.281053

Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education – where are the educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), 39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0